Wiley, J. & Danek, A.H. (in press). Restructuring processes and Aha! experiences in insight problem solving. Nature Reviews Psychology.
Danek, A.H. & Wiley, J. (in press). The insight memory advantage. In C. Salvi, J. Wiley, & S. M. Smith (Eds.), The Emergence of Insight. Cambridge University Press.
Danek, A.H. (in press). The phenomenology of insight: The Aha! experience. In L. Ball & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Creative Cognition. London: Routledge.
Graf, M., Danek, A.H., Vaci, N. & Bilalić, M. (2023). Tracing cognitive processes in insight problem solving: Using GAMs and change point analysis to uncover restructuring. Journal of Intelligence, 11:86. PDF
Bilalić, M., Graf, M., Vaci, N., & Danek, A.H. (2021). The temporal dynamics of insight problem solving – restructuring might not always be sudden. Thinking & Reasoning, 27(1), 1-37. PDF
Rummel J., Iwan, F., Steindorf, L., & Danek, A.H. (2021). The role of attention for insight problem solving: Effects of mindless and mindful incubation periods. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 33(6-7), 757-769. PDF
Danek, A.H. & Kizilirmak, J.M. (2021). Editorial: The whole is more than the sum of its parts – addressing insight problem solving concurrently from a cognitive and an affective perspective. Journal of Cognitive Psychology,33(6-7), 609–615. PDF
Gilhooly, K., & Danek, A.H. (2021). Roger L. Dominowski (1939-2020): His contribution to the study of insightful problem solving. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 33(6–7), 616–619. PDF
Danek, A.H. & Wiley, J. (2020). What causes the insight memory advantage? Cognition, 205, 104411. PDF
Danek, A.H., Williams, J., & Wiley, J. (2020). Closing the gap: connecting sudden representational change to the subjective Aha! experience in insightful problem solving. Psychological Research, 84, 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-0977-8 PDF
Pétervári, J. & Danek, A.H. (2020). Problem solving of magic tricks: guiding to and through an impasse with solution cues. Thinking & Reasoning, 26(4), 502-533. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2019.1668479 PDF
Danek, A.H. & Salvi, C. (2020). Moment of truth: Why Aha! experiences are correct. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54, 484-486. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.380 PDF
Bilalić, M., Graf, M., Vaci, N., & Danek, A.H. (2019). When the solution is on the doorstep: Better solving performance, but diminished Aha! experience for chess experts on the mutilated checkerboard problem. Cognitive Science, 43(8): e12771. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12771 PDF
Danek, A.H. & Flanagin, V.L. (2019). Cognitive conflict and restructuring: The neural basis of two core components of insight. AIMS Neuroscience, 6(2), 60–84. https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2019.2.60 PDF
Fine, P.A., Danek, A.H., Friedlander, K.J., Hocking, I., & Thompson, W.F. (2019). Editorial: Novel approaches for studying creativity in problem-solving and artistic performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 10:2059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02059 PDF
Danek, A.H. (2018). Magic tricks, sudden restructuring and the Aha! experience: A new model of non-monotonic problem solving. In F. Vallee-Tourangeau (Ed.), Insight: On the origins of new ideas. (pp. 51-78). London: Routledge.
https://www.routledge.com/Insight-On-the-Origins-of-New-Ideas/Vallee-Tourangeau/p/book/9781138288089
Schönauer, M., Brodt, S., Pöhlchen, D., Breßmer, A., Danek, A.H., & Gais, S. (2018). Sleep does not promote solving classical insight problems and magic tricks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12:72.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834438/ PDF
Danek, A.H., & Wiley, J. (2017). What about false insights? Deconstructing the Aha! experience along its multiple dimensions for correct and incorrect solutions separately. Frontiers in Psychology, 7:2077. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28163687 PDF
Danek, A.H., Wiley, J., & Öllinger, M. (2016). Solving classical insight problems without Aha! experience: 9 Dot, 8 Coin, and Matchstick Arithmetic Problems. The Journal of Problem Solving, 9(1), 47-57. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/jps/vol9/iss1/4 PDF
Danek, A.H., Öllinger, M., Fraps, T., Grothe, B., & Flanagin, V.L. (2015). An fMRI investigation of expectation violation in magic tricks. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:84. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25699001 PDF
Danek, A.H., Fraps, T., von Müller, A., Grothe, B., & Öllinger, M. (2014). It’s a kind of magic – what self-reports can reveal about the phenomenology of insight problem solving. Frontiers in Psychology, 5:1408. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25538658 PDF
Danek, A.H., Fraps, T., von Müller, A., Grothe, B., & Öllinger, M. (2014). Working Wonders? Investigating insight with magic tricks. Cognition, 130(2), 174-185. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24300080 PDF
Danek, A.H., Gade, M., Lunardelli, A., & Rumiati, R.I. (2013). Tomato and Tuna – A test for language-free assessment of action understanding. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 26(4), 208-217. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24378606 PDF
Danek, A.H., Fraps, T., von Müller, A., Grothe, B. & Öllinger, M. (2013). Aha! experiences leave a mark: facilitated recall of insight solutions. Psychological Research, 77(5), 659–669. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23007629 PDF
Öllinger, M., Jones, G., Faber, A.H. & Knoblich, G. (2013). Cognitive mechanisms of insight: The role of heuristics and representational change in solving the eight-coin problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(3), 931–939. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22799283 PDF
Faber, A.H., Kühnpast, N., Sürer, F., Hinz, A.M., & Danek, A. (2009). The Iso-Effect: Is there specific learning of Tower of London iso-problems? Thinking & Reasoning, 15(3),237-249. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13546780902924308
PDF
Faber, A.H. (2012). Investigation of insight with magic tricks: Introducing a novel paradigm (Dissertation). Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. Retrieved from http://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/15206/ – PDF
Disclaimer:
The articles available on this website are copyrighted to the publishers of the journals or volumes in which the articles appeared. These articles are distributed for personal enrichment or academic use only as a part of the accepted practice that authors are allowed to distribute copies of their articles to interested parties. No commercial use may be made of the articles, nor is mass reproduction of the articles permitted.